Explicit Details hiding in the shadows.
- Thread starter SomeGuy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- blowjob real sex unsimulated
signal_20380
*.info
After watching the whole scene I'm pretty sure it's a woman.
humm I watched carefully the movie ''the dream'' , the scene where she loses her virginity and you can see that the actor seems to have kept his erection throughout the scene. It's discreet, but we seem to catch a second glimpse of his erection as he withdraws from the actress. She's got a great body, by the way.
How the guy managed to maintain his erection I don't know, the technical crew + the second actor joining them
How the guy managed to maintain his erection I don't know, the technical crew + the second actor joining them
Attachments
bronski mac
*.info
Rubbing against a naked Eva Green I imagine a corps would have a hard on, even with an audience!
bronski mac
*.info
My first contribution. Seeing The Dreamers was out in 4K, I had to have a try at an edit. After she moves his erection, you can see she is holding it down during the sex. I would pay good money to see the raw footage, before the edit, of this scene! I can only dream 
Thumbnail of the bit @panda66 posted. 4K mpeg 1.1GB https://dfiles.eu/files/h2wv53tcx?redirect
Thumbnail of the bit @panda66 posted. 4K mpeg 1.1GB https://dfiles.eu/files/h2wv53tcx?redirectIt's true that she's very pretty! I think she was 23 at the time? a lot of actresses are very pretty between 20 and 30.
I'm not too surprised that the actor had an erection, they both look completely naked to me, no covers, nothing to hide their genitals. And even if there's nothing explicit, that doesn't mean it can't have an effect. It's only human. As I said in one of my previous posts, an erection can be accidental, but showing it is an artistic choice.
In my opinion, there's nothing explicit, no explicit act, but the actress seems to have a lot of effect on the actor.
And on a man, the excitement is obviously visible. It's likely that some actresses can also be aroused during the filming of a sex scene (even a simulated one), but on a woman, it's not as obvious as on a man.
And that's right, you can see that the actor has maintained his erection.
I find it adds a little extra when the actor has an erection in a scene, and even if it's simulated, it makes the whole thing more erotic, more realistic.
I'm not too surprised that the actor had an erection, they both look completely naked to me, no covers, nothing to hide their genitals. And even if there's nothing explicit, that doesn't mean it can't have an effect. It's only human. As I said in one of my previous posts, an erection can be accidental, but showing it is an artistic choice.
In my opinion, there's nothing explicit, no explicit act, but the actress seems to have a lot of effect on the actor.
And on a man, the excitement is obviously visible. It's likely that some actresses can also be aroused during the filming of a sex scene (even a simulated one), but on a woman, it's not as obvious as on a man.
And that's right, you can see that the actor has maintained his erection.
I find it adds a little extra when the actor has an erection in a scene, and even if it's simulated, it makes the whole thing more erotic, more realistic.
huarghlbarghl
New Member
Took the words right out of my mouth. She was an absolute goddess then, and still is to this day.
Agree regarding actors who are shown with erections. Is there anywhere I can find a list of scenes from mainstream films that include erections?
Foursome (2023) - Full Movie Watch Online
A married couple having troubles in bed, finding their sexual satisfaction outside their marriage.
b4watch.com
er
erotic but not explicit - thanksFoursome (2023) - Full Movie Watch Online
A married couple having troubles in bed, finding their sexual satisfaction outside their marriage.
A film that went unnoticed. A film that makes me wonder: we don't see anything, but the sex scene filmed with a static camera makes me wonder if there wasn't explicit sexual intercourse?
The pelvic movements seem very realistic.
The pelvic movements seem very realistic.
If one can brighten a bit… if there’s any hint of erection then likely it was real. I don’t think the static camera means anything unless it was only the director and the two actors in the set for privacy. Still, why have penetration for such a short scene?A film that went unnoticed. A film that makes me wonder: we don't see anything, but the sex scene filmed with a static camera makes me wonder if there wasn't explicit sexual intercourse?
The pelvic movements seem very realistic.
You're right,
it was just a guess, but I don't know whether there was a real connection or not. We can't see anything that would suggest it, it seems realistic, but it's not enough to prove the reality of the facts...
Besides, even an erection doesn't prove that a relationship is explicit. If we don't see anything concrete, the hypothesis of a simulated relationship seems to me to be the most likely hypothesis.
As for the length of the scene, I don't think it means much - with the magic of editing, you can shorten the basic extract.
it was just a guess, but I don't know whether there was a real connection or not. We can't see anything that would suggest it, it seems realistic, but it's not enough to prove the reality of the facts...
Besides, even an erection doesn't prove that a relationship is explicit. If we don't see anything concrete, the hypothesis of a simulated relationship seems to me to be the most likely hypothesis.
As for the length of the scene, I don't think it means much - with the magic of editing, you can shorten the basic extract.