Explicit Details hiding in the shadows.

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
I don't see anything to get all excited about ... there's no evidence of anything that shows he's got an erection or any possible genital contact. More than likely he's got on a cock sack and she's got a pussy patch.
 

panda66

Member
It's a great find!

You have a gift for finding beautiful things, I don't know how you do it...

She's gorgeous Eva Green's :p, she's got a great body.

I don't think she's shy at all! She looks completely naked for this scene, and so does the actor. Not to mention explicit, many actors and actresses refuse to appear naked or in their underwear.

For someone who claims to be shy, she doesn't seem very bothered by the actor's erection.

I'm surprised the actor doesn't have a sock or something to hide his genitals. It's something to be expected, the possibility of an actor getting an erection by accident, and besides, if they're both naked... :/

I say this because I have the impression that Eva Green takes the actor's erect penis in her hand to straighten it so that there's no genital contact, it would have been easier, a sock or something! I imagine it must be awkward for actresses that the actor has an erection, and the sock prevents genital contact and saves the actress from having to put her hand on a colleague's sex.

In my opinion, her gesture has no sexual connotation, she just wants to make sure everything's okay.
 
Last edited:
id love nothing more than to see her do real sex acts but cmon its eva green were talking about, one of the biggest names in Hollywood. She wouldn't ruin her career by doing porno stuff. She said she was mainly concerned about what her parents/family would think, so she refused to do the full on stuff.
 

panda66

Member
I checked the original version (I'm posting it below) and the actor's erection is in the base movie, I thought it was a bonus scene, but nope. She is included in the film. But why film it? Curious, :/ this could very well have gone unnoticed.

I imagine there are plenty of movies where the actor has an erection and yet it's not shown on camera.

I remember an interview in French where an actor explained that he accidentally got an erection while filming a scene where he simulated making love to his girlfriend and that the erection was never shown to the screen. He said the actress noticed it and it wasn't a problem.

Filming an explicit sex scene is tricky for several reasons, indeed, what will the family think? friends?, once the film is released, there is no going back. The scene must have added value so as not to fall into basic porn.

I had shared on the forum an interview in French with the directors of the film ''sexual chronicle of a family today'' and the casting was very difficult, most of the actresses, they did porn before in the film except in the scene of the first time where the two actors are not porn actors and I find that very positive, it adds a lot of authenticity to the scene.

Upstream, there is a lot of preparation, a building of trust to be put in place between the technical team and the actors.

The rare (non-pornographic) actresses who agree to shoot explicit scenes, I congratulate them! They are courageous.

And I like the idea that this kind of scene is rare, it makes it all the more precious, so to speak.

I like the fact that it's not mundane.

 

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
Wow...didn't realize that this clip of Eva Green would cause this much of a reaction ;), but I agree that it is pretty hot. I had that "What did I just see" moment when watching the 4K release on a big screen and noticed the shadowy erection and her hand position.

As for why it is in the movie and Eva agreeing to do the nude scenes, first of all, it's a Bernardo Bertolucci (of the "Last Tango in Paris" controversy) film and second, it is Eva Green's first movie and she was a "big, big fan of Bernardo" and was "desperate to do it". Read more from Eva Green's interview in Vulture.com article: "Eva Green Answers Every Question We Have About The Dreamers".

The scene has gone unnoticed as it goes by pretty quick and the erection is "lost in the shadows" plus Eva Green's gorgeous body is a big distraction.
 
Last edited:

cellodbt

New Member
Belen Cuesta in the movie The Endless Trench.

I can´t tell if it was real, but the actor clearly had an erection.
 

Attachments

  • EndlessTrenchThe-Cuesta-UHD-01_hd - frame at 0m45s.jpg
    EndlessTrenchThe-Cuesta-UHD-01_hd - frame at 0m45s.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 193
  • EndlessTrenchThe-Cuesta-UHD-01_hd - frame at 0m53s.jpg
    EndlessTrenchThe-Cuesta-UHD-01_hd - frame at 0m53s.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 192
  • EndlessTrenchThe-Cuesta-UHD-01_hd - frame at 0m54s.jpg
    EndlessTrenchThe-Cuesta-UHD-01_hd - frame at 0m54s.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 189
  • EndlessTrenchThe-Cuesta-UHD-01_hd.mp4
    41.7 MB
I checked the original version (I'm posting it below) and the actor's erection is in the base movie, I thought it was a bonus scene, but nope. She is included in the film. But why film it? Curious, :/ this could very well have gone unnoticed.

I imagine there are plenty of movies where the actor has an erection and yet it's not shown on camera.

I remember an interview in French where an actor explained that he accidentally got an erection while filming a scene where he simulated making love to his girlfriend and that the erection was never shown to the screen. He said the actress noticed it and it wasn't a problem.

Filming an explicit sex scene is tricky for several reasons, indeed, what will the family think? friends?, once the film is released, there is no going back. The scene must have added value so as not to fall into basic porn.

I had shared on the forum an interview in French with the directors of the film ''sexual chronicle of a family today'' and the casting was very difficult, most of the actresses, they did porn before in the film except in the scene of the first time where the two actors are not porn actors and I find that very positive, it adds a lot of authenticity to the scene.

Upstream, there is a lot of preparation, a building of trust to be put in place between the technical team and the actors.

The rare (non-pornographic) actresses who agree to shoot explicit scenes, I congratulate them! They are courageous.

And I like the idea that this kind of scene is rare, it makes it all the more precious, so to speak.

I like the fact that it's not mundane.

They can do all kinds of tricks with cameras. Look at nymphomaniac- Charlotte Gainsbourg isn't really getting gangbanged by the 2 black dudes.
 

EternalSecret

New Member
They can do all kinds of tricks with cameras. Look at nymphomaniac- Charlotte Gainsbourg isn't really getting gangbanged by the 2 black dudes.
That scene wasn't that hard to spot the simulation with the way the guy's leg is splitting the top and bottom half of Charlotte's body. But the scene where Stacy Martin's character is having sex with a random orderly when her dad is in the hospital blew my mind. If that's truly a composite shot then it's one of the best pieces of work I've ever seen in a film. There are also no obvious cuts when the camera pans up to her face from down below.
 

panda66

Member
It’s true, explicit doesn’t mean authentic! and “nymphomaniac” films are a good example of this.

I understand that the scenes were shot using stand-ins and that there were even special effects apparently.

There are also other types of explicit scenes where doubt about their veracity is inevitable. I am thinking, for example, of the film “Passion”; There was quite a debate on the forum as to whether these were really the two actors, but if we analyze the question pragmatically, we have to face the facts: we will never be one hundred percent sure.

In the film “Sexual Chronicle of a Family Today,” for example, doubt is largely dispelled. For example, in the “first time” scene, we see the two actors lying naked in missionary position, and we can clearly see that the actor is penetrating the actress. It's an explicit and authentic scene! In my opinion, an explicit and authentic scene should not include dubbing, special effects or prosthetics, and to dispel as many doubts as possible, the faces of the actors should be visible + the sexual act. And that is the case here. Besides, for me, it's still one of the best explicit scenes in a mainstream, non-pornographic film. The two actors are real actors, they're not from the porn industry, no special effects, no body doubles, the faces of both actors are visible at the same time as the sexual act. The scene is romantic and sweet, but at the same time very hot.

Respect to both actors for taking on the role, they've given us one of the best explicit scenes ever.

It's important to remember that being explicit doesn't necessarily mean that the relationship is genuine. There are a thousand and one ways to create subterfuge.
 
Last edited:

Shikoza

New Member
Hello,

Can I get opinions if anything is happening in this scene? Looks like Andree is really doing it with the male in East End Hustle.
 
Top