I checked the original version (I'm posting it below) and the actor's erection is in the base movie, I thought it was a bonus scene, but nope. She is included in the film. But why film it? Curious, :/ this could very well have gone unnoticed.
I imagine there are plenty of movies where the actor has an erection and yet it's not shown on camera.
I remember an interview in French where an actor explained that he accidentally got an erection while filming a scene where he simulated making love to his girlfriend and that the erection was never shown to the screen. He said the actress noticed it and it wasn't a problem.
Filming an explicit sex scene is tricky for several reasons, indeed, what will the family think? friends?, once the film is released, there is no going back. The scene must have added value so as not to fall into basic porn.
I had shared on the forum an interview in French with the directors of the film ''sexual chronicle of a family today'' and the casting was very difficult, most of the actresses, they did porn before in the film except in the scene of the first time where the two actors are not porn actors and I find that very positive, it adds a lot of authenticity to the scene.
Upstream, there is a lot of preparation, a building of trust to be put in place between the technical team and the actors.
The rare (non-pornographic) actresses who agree to shoot explicit scenes, I congratulate them! They are courageous.
And I like the idea that this kind of scene is rare, it makes it all the more precious, so to speak.
I like the fact that it's not mundane.
Gofile is a free, secure file sharing and storage platform. With unlimited bandwidth and storage, you can easily store and share files of any type without any limits. Our advanced features, such as CDN support and password protection, make Gofile the ideal choice for individuals and businesses...
gofile.io