Explicit Details hiding in the shadows.

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
Barbara colen from aquarius

Real Cunnilingus?

Scene enhanced ... his tongue is close to her pussy but no evidence of any contact.

bc.jpg

https://1fichier.com/?7j7q0khy532iutf8hllb
https://www.mediafire.com/file/8g0p2rrmjbnzpfv/Barbara.Colen.Aquarius.2016.mkv/file
 

Magaivi

*.info
Hello everyone, I'm new here, I live in Brazil and I'm going to bring some well-known scenes here that caused a lot of controversy because they are very realistic.

Denise Dumont is still remembered today for this memorable scene where the actor clearly rubs her well and possibly penetrates her if you pay attention and hear her moan of pleasure.

https://cdn2.aznude.com/sparkthumbs/9d9845b7a6a34a01ad3f457cb6946d61-hd.mp4
 

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
@SomeGuy thank you very much!

This is a link from another sex scene
Danielle Rosa Real Sex, Breasts Scene in Asco - AZNude
https://www.aznude.com/azncdn/g4ztcnztfzwxana/g4ztcnztfzwxana-hd.html

Prothestic.?? Cámara trick? What do you think ? Thanks
Enhanced video of the scene in slow motion... looks like there is some sort of cover as we only see his cock but no balls. However, no evidence to indicate that the penetration wasn't real as the angle rules out sliding it between her ass or over her belly ... it's your guess.

d.rosa.jpg

https://1fichier.com/?p7mh99m2wcwdxoepltmo
https://www.mediafire.com/file/7k5wjnkf93hk2ot/Danielle_Rosa.Asco_%28_2015_%29.1080p.enhanced.mp4/file
 

bro94

Member
Enhanced video of the scene in slow motion... looks like there is some sort of cover as we only see his cock but no balls. However, no evidence to indicate that the penetration wasn't real as the angle rules out sliding it between her ass or over her belly ... it's your guess.

View attachment 311703

https://1fichier.com/?p7mh99m2wcwdxoepltmo
https://www.mediafire.com/file/7k5wjnkf93hk2ot/Danielle_Rosa.Asco_%28_2015_%29.1080p.enhanced.mp4/file
It was not real. I asked the director (who also states that a lot of people asked this to him over the years) and he said it was not real, but rather made out of CGI effects.
 

bmlll

New Member
It was not real. I asked the director (who also states that a lot of people asked this to him over the years) and he said it was not real, but rather made out of CGI effects.

yep, and not a good one, besides the weird shape of the penis and missing balls, it's also anatomically off.
 

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member

@SomeGuy can you do your magic my friend? I tried a little bit with VLC but maybe you can do better.
Here you go....enhanced and in slo-mo. IMO, maybe some genital rubbing but no evidence of penetration in the whole sequence.

(at :39 secs and :43 secs) No penetration as his erection clearly outside and rubbing down her pussy/ass
Leviatan0s.39.jpg Leviatan1s.43.jpg

(at :60 and 2:28) No penetration...his erection is sliding behind her ass. When he comes off her at 2:28, his erection is from behind and not from her vagina
Leviatan2s.60.jpg Leviatan3s.2.28.jpg
https://1fichier.com/?pvtfcv98bc5xvspwxom2
https://www.mediafire.com/file/89a17rvjbzww5ym/Leviatan_%282016%29.slo.mp4/file
 
Last edited:

mammos

*.info
Here you go....enhanced and in slo-mo. IMO, maybe some genital rubbing but no evidence of penetration in the whole sequence.

(at :39 secs and :43 secs) No penetration as his erection clearly outside and rubbing down her pussy/ass
View attachment 313290 View attachment 313291

(at :60 and 2:28) No penetration...his erection is sliding behind her ass. When he comes off her at 2:28, his erection is from behind and not from her vagina
View attachment 313294 View attachment 313296
https://1fichier.com/?pvtfcv98bc5xvspwxom2
https://www.mediafire.com/file/89a17rvjbzww5ym/Leviatan_%282016%29.slo.mp4/file

Thank you. It looked very convincing though.
 

mop12

New Member
Here you go....enhanced and in slo-mo. IMO, maybe some genital rubbing but no evidence of penetration in the whole sequence.

(at :39 secs and :43 secs) No penetration as his erection clearly outside and rubbing down her pussy/ass
View attachment 313290 View attachment 313291

(at :60 and 2:28) No penetration...his erection is sliding behind her ass. When he comes off her at 2:28, his erection is from behind and not from her vagina
View attachment 313294 View attachment 313296
https://1fichier.com/?pvtfcv98bc5xvspwxom2
https://www.mediafire.com/file/89a17rvjbzww5ym/Leviatan_%282016%29.slo.mp4/file
Great catch! This is precisely what this thread is all about: they are actors, in some cases professional actors, acting as real life but both have their private lives and this should be kept separated in most of the cases… some cases not. Or perhaps they simply don’t care that much

In this case, despite all the rubbing and physical contact involved, he is clearly not penetrating her. I always find fascinating to realize the erected/semi-erect penis and specifically the use of a condom. It tells me the obvious, he is a human being
 

bro94

Member
Great catch! This is precisely what this thread is all about: they are actors, in some cases professional actors, acting as real life but both have their private lives and this should be kept separated in most of the cases… some cases not. Or perhaps they simply don’t care that much

In this case, despite all the rubbing and physical contact involved, he is clearly not penetrating her. I always find fascinating to realize the erected/semi-erect penis and specifically the use of a condom. It tells me the obvious, he is a human being
I’m always fascinated by that too when the actor is clearly erect or semi-erect or even using a condom (which doesn’t mean actual sex happened).
I had the chance of talking with some of the directors and actors of some stuff about that. They all say even though it was very technical and for artistic purposes… but again, if you’re erect or even penetrating the actress, you’re clearly aroused by her (otherwise no erection or real sex would happen). Seems there’s a taboo admitting that they just found the actress hot (which, again, just shows he’s a human being).
 
Top