I don't think it's real though. Just think about it the male actor was so discrete in not showing his penis that he even used a cover or tucked his willy between his legs . Why would he have unsimulated sex if he was so sure of showing it in any prior scenes?? This doesn't make any sense to me.
Explicit Laure Massard in Passion 2016
- Thread starter Friendlyfella
- Start date
Beacause this is not at porn movie. Jeezes....
letsgroove37
*.info
You're watching too much porn young boy
Then why would he have real penetrative sex onscreen?? Same goes for the girl here.
good_guy
Well-Known Member
That doesn't have much credibility though. It's probably someone from this forum that set that trivia.
Have you even watched the scene?
It's painfully obvious, that the penetration is real. You can even clearly see the condom that was used.
Just view it in VLC and use the tools to brighten the image.
I'm talking about the actors performing the penetration scene not the actual sex because I do have eyes and I can see it happening.
good_guy
Well-Known Member
First of all, you're free to believe what you want regarding this scene, so if you think it's a body double then ok
But remember that you didn't bring any evidence that proves your opinion and just the fact that the director did choose not to show the faces of the actors during the explicit nsex act is not really an evidence!
Also when they use a body double usually they don't show the double's full body because it's almost impossible to get a body double that is exactly like the main actress/actor (mainly the actress) , and if you look carefully here it's the same exact body down to the smallest details, even her knees are the same
Finally, regardless of who put the info on IMDB, it's still there and if this is not true then we would have heard from the actress, actor because even in Europe it's that simple for actress to have an explicit sex scenes in a mainstream movie ...
But again, you're free to think what you want,
If you still believe it's a body double, then good for you...
This is my last reply to this ...
As all you might be well aware “the devil is in the details”, there is no chance on how this scene could had been performed by anyone else but the two lead actors.
a) the moll analysis done above in this thread is a major proof
b) how likely a short film from a non major director/studio could afford to have body doubles or any sort of 2016-CGI? How can you justify such investment for a short film screening in festivals e.g. low budget project
c) people do have sex! Every day! You do it, I do it, everyone is doing it. They are both very attractive and they did it in safety aka condom. I suspect they both had a great time there. I really hope so.
d) Both actor and actress paving way for their careers, perhaps answering to to demands from the crew/director or promises such “nothing will be ever seen”
e) I believe (and actually I have been once told by a good friend on this field) about the obvious: the actors talk and talk and talk and discuss a lot on these matters and decide themselves on what they want to do. In particular on low budget project such this.
f) something uncomfortable might had occurred afterwards since information e.g. interviews, etc on the movies are not available. Also social media on it sounds as been removed at some point. My bet is also the obvious point: actors surprised with the final result including such explicit camera angles. In their place I’d also be quite pissed as well, but life goes on.
a) the moll analysis done above in this thread is a major proof
b) how likely a short film from a non major director/studio could afford to have body doubles or any sort of 2016-CGI? How can you justify such investment for a short film screening in festivals e.g. low budget project
c) people do have sex! Every day! You do it, I do it, everyone is doing it. They are both very attractive and they did it in safety aka condom. I suspect they both had a great time there. I really hope so.
d) Both actor and actress paving way for their careers, perhaps answering to to demands from the crew/director or promises such “nothing will be ever seen”
e) I believe (and actually I have been once told by a good friend on this field) about the obvious: the actors talk and talk and talk and discuss a lot on these matters and decide themselves on what they want to do. In particular on low budget project such this.
f) something uncomfortable might had occurred afterwards since information e.g. interviews, etc on the movies are not available. Also social media on it sounds as been removed at some point. My bet is also the obvious point: actors surprised with the final result including such explicit camera angles. In their place I’d also be quite pissed as well, but life goes on.
I'm sorry for being so ignorant but you are right. It is them having real sex as I did my own research on both these actors. In my mind if the male actor checks out as the one in the scene then the female actress would definitely be her as he is a far well known personality than she is. Sorry for being a prick again.
Charles100
New Member
This guy may be her real-life husband or boyfriend, or was at the time, according to her Instagram photos. Although it's hard to tell, it could be someone else. Bummer if it's true though, it's way hotter to me if the actress is not in a relationship with the man in the scene.
Last edited:
Charles100
New Member
Apparently, it was him.