I do believe it's time for some good-old-fashioned
BWA HA HA HA HA!
(Is it still necroposting if I'm the original thread author and I have something new to contribute?)
Anyway, my reason for invoking the darkest-of-all-forum-practices is my recent discovery of the full "inter(a)nal f/ear" performance by the talented Rebecca Patek. Yes, the one in which she gets anally penetrated by a d!ldo in front of an audience. With her fully hardcore self-made p0rn clip (posted on the previous page) projected on the wall behind her...
Granted, the viewing angle is not really revealing,
but this is the one instance in which we can be reasonably sure she actually did it for real:
ineter(a)nalfear (720p).7z.001
ineter(a)nalfear (720p).7z.002
ineter(a)nalfear (720p).7z.003
ineter(a)nalfear (720p).7z.004
I would still love to get my hands on her other explicit works. Including the art-p0rn she did as Toxic Shock for the ETLE group ("The Oh Files").
As a bonus, I also have some images from "Não Fornicarás", the
Other explicit show the Os Satyros group ("Filosofia na Alkova") did. The nude sex scene (shown in the preview) was not simulated. Because Os Satyros.
I have no videos to thumbnail, so the preview is just a single image from the folder. Some images are non-nude, some are censored, most are not.
spetusp_satyrus_72157646978094119.7z.001
spetusp_satyrus_72157646978094119.7z.002
spetusp_satyrus_72157646978094119.7z.003
spetusp_satyrus_72157646978094119.7z.004
spetusp_satyrus_72157646978094119.7z.005
spetusp_satyrus_72157646978094119.7z.006
In general, I'm thinking about reviving this thread on a more permanent basis. I should have a few more clips I collected over the past few years. Not a lot, and I still need to find where they are, but I'll post them when I'll find them. No promises though!
If anyone has anything to contribute here, you will be welcome. I still hope, against all odds, to someday find "Pornodrama II: Un Esquimal". Yes, I know the sequel is out ("Pornodrama 2.1" followed by "Pornodrama III"), but I read it is non-explicit unlike it's predecessor.