You don't need to delete your posts, they were interesting.
Explicit Details hiding in the shadows.
- Thread starter SomeGuy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- blowjob real sex unsimulated
Probably a real enough erection. But the angles don't line up for penetration. She would be lower than she is. Not to mention, this part of the scene is not meant to be a penetrating moment. She is just siting on top of him because he isn't in the moment anymore. However great catch, Please don't be discouraged in posting. You never know if you will find that one in a million shot that someone thought would slip through. All be it very unlikely.
Last edited:
actress Lorna Yin ,
videocelebs.net
Grace Morgan nude, Madison Oakley nude, Spring Lyons nude, Elliot Frances Flynn nude, Lorna Yin nude - Peacemaker s02e01 (2025)
Grace Morgan nude, Madison Oakley nude, Spring Lyons nude, Elliot Frances Flynn nude, Lorna Yin nude - Peacemaker s02e01 (2025). Grace Morgan,...
Exactly. If we’re going to post anything here, it should be the actual on‑screen material, those scenes where a bit of light adjustment helps reveal details that were originally buried in the darkness. That’s how this thread started, and many early posts uncovered some genuinely interesting moments hidden in those dim frames.
Unfortunately, the direction has shifted. A lot of recent posts boil down to a single frame of incidental/genital contact, followed by people filling in the blanks and imagining an entire “scene” that never appears on screen. No matter how “suggestive” a frame might look, if the action isn’t actually shown, it doesn’t belong here.
At that point, it stops being about what’s really in the footage and turns into people projecting fantasies and calling them “hidden details.” That’s not what this thread is for.
WorthlessDave
New Member
I kind of disagree there. If you're waiting for genuine extra mile footage, you'll be waiting a long time. Genital contact, whether incidental or not, constitutes a borderline grey area that still makes it suitable for this forum. I mean, if a guy is erect (even partially) in a mainstream film and there's genital contact, you really think it's not worth posting on the basis that it could be incidental? At the very least, one of the actors is turned on beyond acting. For the post you're talking about, I doubt the person posting had any knowledge of it being some sort of contraption. If we don't allow the borderline stuff, this place will be a ghost town.
I agree with you. The way that filmmaking is being policed now with intimacy coordinators. The days of unstimulated/ explicit genital interactions in mainstream movies are pretty much over. And I think there isn't much that hasn't been covered in this thread. There is a very slim chance that you would have any real genital contact that is more than incidental in anything new. The title of the thread is detail in the shadows. So, shouldn't anything that has been hidden from the viewer that remotely shows contact fit the intent of this thread under the circumstances.
With the progression of AI. Even we do get some rare extra mile footage. Who knows if it will be real or not.
I get the concern about the thread "dying" but cluttering it with unrelated or imagined content doesn’t keep it alive, it just buries the original purpose. A discussion only stays meaningful if people actually stick to what the thread is about. Once it turns into random single‑frame guesses and fantasy filler, it’s not "active", it’s just noisy!
Activity for its own sake isn’t the goal, relevance is! If there’s nothing new that genuinely fits the topic, then the thread can slow down naturally until someone finds something real to contribute. That’s how a focused discussion works. Flooding it with off‑topic speculation doesn't keep the thread healthy, it just makes it harder for people who are looking for actual on‑screen details to find anything worthwhile.
And just to be clear, it’s not like people are being deprived of a place to post that other kind of content. We already have threads specifically for speculation, fantasies, or "what I think is happening even if it’s not on screen". Anyone who wants to share that is completely free to do so there, or even start a brand‑new thread if they feel strongly about it.
Undercover explicity
Hey Guys, I have a question. I found few movies that contains scenes that are explicit to me. For a example this one: ancensored.com/clip/positivo/paula-brasca/5aec881b697a8530d26aa44b At 0:34-0:35 you See the dick of the guy in between her vagina. I'm a good analyst. On the web, you will...
Genital contact - Bullets of Justice (2020)
Film has some hot sex and nude scenes, one containing explicit female and male nudity. Available on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/ondemand/bulletsofjustice/452954846 [/URL]
Genital contact - Si vis pacem, para bellum (2016)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5922940/ Haven't seen this one before, but it looks that there is some genital contact during the sex scene. It looks likes he is flaccid though and his member just bounces around...
Genital contact - Una mujer 2017
Not a 100% sure but it could be real penetration ... clear pussy on cock grinding at least ... Contains 2 or 3 different sex scenes, inluding at around 1:24:00 Enjoy : https://1fichier.com/?uj6du78bhxy7m765b5yu
Genital contact - Sex & Violence ( 2013/2015 )
Canada cable TV Mini-Series http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2931316/ Trailer the sex scenes really explicit and very hot, including a sex scene with hard Dick & Pussy(?) -pic 1 & 2/ Dick inside pussy(?) pic 3. Download this video - http://www.mediafire.com/?3qadc5uvg2ex428 p.s. the gay sex...
Last edited:
I don't think we should be too pessimistic. There will always be producers who take the risk of filming real sex scenes and showing an actor's accidental erection on screen, but you're not wrong. With the advent of intimacy coordinators, AI, and other developments, it will probably become increasingly prudish in big productions. However, we will always have short films and experimental films that will have more freedom.
And intimacy coordinators remain a Western phenomenon. By that I mean that I don't think it's widespread everywhere; there are probably countries that don't use intimacy coordinators, or use them very little.
I like the “undercover” topic, I share a lot on it because there's more of an attitude about the content being shared.
I really liked the excerpt from an unknown film, apparently from Eastern Europe, where you can see that the actor in the dark clearly has a huge erection.
And intimacy coordinators remain a Western phenomenon. By that I mean that I don't think it's widespread everywhere; there are probably countries that don't use intimacy coordinators, or use them very little.
I like the “undercover” topic, I share a lot on it because there's more of an attitude about the content being shared.
I really liked the excerpt from an unknown film, apparently from Eastern Europe, where you can see that the actor in the dark clearly has a huge erection.