18+ Kerry Fox - Intimacy

ozil23

New Member
still dont get it why would a married woman do scenes like that
I mean I like to watch but if it was my wife I would not allowed
 

al112

Active Member
still dont get it why would a married woman do scenes like that
I mean I like to watch but if it was my wife I would not allowed

"Why would any married woman have sex with another actor in a movie to begin with?"

I applied your stupid logic into my question.
 

Tazz

Active Member
still dont get it why would a married woman do scenes like that
I mean I like to watch but if it was my wife I would not allowed
"Why would any married woman get naked in front of another man in front of a camera and 20 behind it?"
 

Noire

New Member
I dont see anything close to penetration.
Actually,there is a scene where he is penetrating her. You would need to brighten the scene. But, you can see a small amount of shaft going into her. You need to go frame by frame.They say that the sexual was simulated. But the scene thats shows his ball. Is that scene.
 

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
KerryFox.jpg
Scene brightened from a blu-ray source and I see no evidence of any shaft going in throughout the entire scene.
This is the clearest frame of that scene ... if there was any penetration it would show.

Kerry Fox3a.jpg

Second scene where they roll around before having sex and supposedly according to that quote from "movienudity" (posted by @myfamousteen)
was "very real". It shows his fingers holding what looks like the shadow of his erection but I see no evidence of penetration .. you have to use your imagination.
 
Last edited:

Noire

New Member
If you are using the image from the 1st scene at that contrast. You did not brighten the scene enough. You need to desaturated color and flatten the contrast as well as brighten the image. That will make them appear very pale. The dark shadows with disappearing and you will be able to see his scrotum clearly. There is a split second when you can see the smallest part of his shaft entering her. It is not the moment from the image that you posted. It is when he has his hand on her butt cheek. Once you brighten it properly, You should be able to tell the the movements and angles are consistent with actual penetration.

But, some of you won't believe it unless you see an entire shaft from head to base go in. And then you will say it is AI.

Also, I realize that this is not a determining factor but I will mention it. At the very end of the seen. you can see that the condom has been used. Condoms don't look like that without penetration. I can guarantee you. No director or special effects editor would go through the trouble of staging a used condom for this low budget production.
 
Last edited:

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
Brightened closeup of scene where he has his hand on her butt cheek with a clear view of his scrotum

Kerry2s.jpg

There's a shadow but I'm not convinced that there is any evidence of a shaft entering her.. you can try to boost the brightness some more to see what that shadow is but I don't trust over-brightened images as they tend to introduce artifacts that are not actually present.

If you want to judge it for yourself frame by frame, I posted the short brightened slo-motion clip of the scene close up.

https://www.mediafire.com/file/4s4htgdzcbnkvif/KerryFox.closeup.mp4/file
 
Last edited:

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
Thank you @NakedDan. From the article

""The final question was, would they be having penetrative sex? Logical or not, that was the impassable barrier for me, and for Kerry also."

That closes the case for me.

However, there will still be some who are not convinced by saying that what was said in the interview can just be a cover story and that's fine. ... we just present all the facts, it's what you see that matters
 
Last edited:
Top