Explicit Nudity The Cohasset Snuff Film (2012)

[JohnsonJ]

Film has a scene that gives a a decent view(in video) of an actress labia and vulva. It's part of a strangling scenes, a lot of movement, hard to get any decent screenshots. Warning disturbing content.

Available here

Watch The Cohasset Snuff Film Online | Vimeo On Demand

In 2009, the small town of Cohasset, Massachusetts was rocked with tragedy. A 17-year-old high school senior named Collin Mason murdered three classmates. All the…

vimeo.com

 

[Slimmpy09]

I find Snuff videos very very dangerous, to start with child pornography, I don’t like such content, sorry is just my opinion.

 

[JohnsonJ]

I find Snuff videos very very dangerous, to start with child pornography, I don’t like such content, sorry is just my opinion.

I find them dangerous too... That is real snuff videos, not fake one made for a piece of entertainment. To each their own though.

 

[Warfighter02]

I find Snuff videos very very dangerous, to start with child pornography, I don’t like such content, sorry is just my opinion.

This site actually had a member who, for unknown reasons, used the actual name and profile pic of a convicted pedophile. That user is gone now but it is still unknown whether it was indeed the pedo or was just someone masquerading as him. Either way I feel it puts a bad name to the site and the rest of us.

 

[Slimmpy09]

I would like to see such content banned here on this very good website

 

[JohnsonJ]

I would like to see such content banned here on this very good website

Drawing a line at simulated violence between actors and actresses is odd on a site that glorifies unsimulated sexual acts between actors and actresses. It's fine if the content doesn't suit you, but it is fake and far from dangerous. To say it is, is as wrong as the argument that videogame lead to violence. Again fine if your not a fan but it not your place, mines, or anyone else's to be calling for banning the content.

 

[tng]

If you come to the 'Underground/Cult/Slasher movies' section what the hell do you think you're going to see? Personally I'm not a fan of blood and gore, but it's some of the most creative and unfiltered cinema you're ever going to see which I highly respect.

 

[Warfighter02]

Drawing a line at simulated violence between actors and actresses is odd on a site that glorifies unsimulated sexual acts between actors and actresses. It's fine if the content doesn't suit you, but it is fake and far from dangerous. To say it is, is as wrong as the argument that videogame lead to violence. Again fine if your not a fan but it not your place, mines, or anyone else's to be calling for banning the content.

While I may not necessarily agree with Slimmpy09's ascertation that such "acts" should be banned since that is to me for the site's admin to decide, I do wish to make a point in commenting on your implication that simulated violence and unsimulated sexual acts are one and the same. It is not. Violence, be it against men or particularly women, is a real problem in society today. In countries facing endless lockdowns, domestic violence cases have shot up exponentially, which include murders. While I admit that I have not watched the scene you posted here, it would seem to me strangling a woman, unprovoked, from behind exemplifies this. Snuff films are of course simulated, but they glorify violence nonetheless and sadly enough for some of us to actually "beat another to", pun intended. That said, it is not my place to tell you what you can or otherwise do. I may not share your interests, but I will not deter you either. I think it should suffice for us who are not agreeable with such things to simply avoid that particular section which thankfully Mammos have thoughtfully provided us.

 

[Slimmpy09]

Well, I didn’t want to upset anyone, that’s far from me, and I’m not asking for it.
to banish on this, I’m sorry when it came out like this, it’s up to everyone to decide for themselves whether they like it or not, and sorry to everyone, I didn’t want to start a discussion with it, I don’t want to discriminate

 

[JohnsonJ]

While I may not necessarily agree with Slimmpy09's ascertation that such "acts" should be banned since that is to me for the site's admin to decide, I do wish to make a point in commenting on your implication that simulated violence and unsimulated sexual acts are one and the same. It is not. Violence, be it against men or particularly women, is a real problem in society today. In countries facing endless lockdowns, domestic violence cases have shot up exponentially, which include murders. While I admit that I have not watched the scene you posted here, it would seem to me strangling a woman, unprovoked, from behind exemplifies this. Snuff films are of course simulated, but they glorify violence nonetheless and sadly enough for some of us to actually "beat another to", pun intended. That said, it is not my place to tell you what you can or otherwise do. I may not share your interests, but I will not deter you either. I think it should suffice for us who are not agreeable with such things to simply avoid that particular section which thankfully Mammos have thoughtfully provided us.

It's simple there is no evidence that simulated violence in media cause real violence, in fact in effort to find evidence, proof to the contrary constantly emerges. Real life violence is sad, no one disputes that, this scene has nothing to do with real life violence. There more comparable between simulated violence and unsimulated sex acts in films than real life violence, which saying there one in the same wasn't the point I was making though. A site that searches for real and explicit sex/nudity in films doesn't want it if there is simulated violence? That is weird and that was the point.

This post sounds extremely dickish in my reading in my head, but trust me I'm not attempting to be. You're not wrong about real life violence, and understandably due to it, scenes like these can be uncomfortable for some. In those cases though you avoid the content, not call for bans. Also part of the point I was making.

 

[JohnsonJ]

Well, I didn’t want to upset anyone, that’s far from me, and I’m not asking for it.
to banish on this, I’m sorry when it came out like this, it’s up to everyone to decide for themselves whether they like it or not, and sorry to everyone, I didn’t want to start a discussion with it, I don’t want to discriminate

You're all good. Disagreement between people are normal. A debate is bound to arise every once in a while.

 

[Warfighter02]

It's simple there is no evidence that simulated violence in media cause real violence, in fact in effort to find evidence, proof to the contrary constantly emerges. Real life violence is sad, no one disputes that, this scene has nothing to do with real life violence. There more comparable between simulated violence and unsimulated sex acts in films than real life violence, which saying there one in the same wasn't the point I was making though. A site that searches for real and explicit sex/nudity in films doesn't want it if there is simulated violence? That is weird and that was the point.

This post sounds extremely dickish in my reading in my head, but trust me I'm not attempting to be. You're not wrong about real life violence, and understandably due to it, scenes like these can be uncomfortable for some. In those cases though you avoid the content, not call for bans. Also part of the point I was making.

I don't know how your way of thinking really is, but I still find that you're not catching my point either. Violence is violence. A violent act causes hurt, or worse, to another human being. No one is saying someone is actually hurt in scenes with simulated violence, that's why it's called acting. But, with certain specific exceptions, a film that is done on the express purpose of sexually stimulating its audience with violence (a snuff film for example) is to me downright sickening. Mind my language. I believe it is called Sadism. Why? Because it glorifies seeing someone hurt. It encourages the feeling of satisfaction at seeing someone else's pain. For some, it even tittilates them to a point that they "beat one out", figuratively and literally, whatever you'd interpret it as.

Now you've mentioned unsimulated sex several times now. How does it differ from simulated violence you ask? Again, I don't know your way of seeing things but, the way I see it as do many others do I would wager, is that is just an honest, real depiction of human emotional exchange. This exchange, sex, is only done differently than simulated sex scenes in that the actors consciously and consentingly decide to have real sex on camera for whatever reason they may offer. Nobody is hurt doing so, and if anything it is a celebration of mankind's basic instinct of carnal desires. It stimulates the audience with a real and natural depiction of pleasure and enjoyment. How can this be anything remotely similar to pleasure derived from seeing someone grimace in unsolicited pain?

But alas to each his own.

 

[jasonraybould]

My worry isn't so much the content as long as its fake as i can ignore it but more someone unaware could come think its real and start causing trouble for the site, snuff fake or not does hover on a fine line and can lead to sites getting a bad reputation.

 

[Slimmpy09]

I’m not going to show this very nice website, even if I didn’t like those snuff movies, but that’s my thing, what I don’t want is that this site gets a bad reputation or even closes, I think we all learned something here, that everyone can decide for themselves what they watch.

 

[JohnsonJ]

I don't know how your way of thinking really is, but I still find that you're not catching my point either. Violence is violence. A violent act causes hurt, or worse, to another human being. No one is saying someone is actually hurt in scenes with simulated violence, that's why it's called acting. But, with certain specific exceptions, a film that is done on the express purpose of sexually stimulating its audience with violence (a snuff film for example) is to me downright sickening. Mind my language. I believe it is called Sadism. Why? Because it glorifies seeing someone hurt. It encourages the feeling of satisfaction at seeing someone else's pain. For some, it even tittilates them to a point that they "beat one out", figuratively and literally, whatever you'd interpret it as.

Now you've mentioned unsimulated sex several times now. How does it differ from simulated violence you ask? Again, I don't know your way of seeing things but, the way I see it as do many others do I would wager, is that is just an honest, real depiction of human emotional exchange. This exchange, sex, is only done differently than simulated sex scenes in that the actors consciously and consentingly decide to have real sex on camera for whatever reason they may offer. Nobody is hurt doing so, and if anything it is a celebration of mankind's basic instinct of carnal desires. It stimulates the audience with a real and natural depiction of pleasure and enjoyment. How can this be anything remotely similar to pleasure derived from seeing someone grimace in unsolicited pain?

But alas to each his own.

A sadist is a sadist regardless of what movies they watch. Watching simulated violence isn't making non-sadist into sadist. The violence in these films typically is not meant to be celebrated, at least not in the sense you're suggesting. Yeah in a horror film where the protagonist is the villain you root for and hope for the killing of the antagonist(innocent) people because that how films work, but unless you are a sadist, you know the villain is still the villain regardless of being the protagonist. You may root for them, but you don't see their actions as being right, moral, good, etc....

Fuck it, I'm done. Thought this was a cool site when I found it to share the love of explicit sex and nudity, but if majority of my contributions going to be sickening to users, I don't have shit much else to offer.