www.imdb.com/title/tt2025594
Explicit nudity of pregnat woman, some pussy touching in preparing to birth
Explicit nudity of pregnat woman, some pussy touching in preparing to birth
Explicit Kirsa Nicholina (1969) dir. Gunvor Nelson
- Thread starter Petr_1988
- Start date
letsgroove37
Member
Are you serious ?
more details to understand the question
letsgroove37
Member
Seriously ? You're sexualizing the birth if a child ? What's wrong with you ? Are you nuts ?
Where did I write about the sexualization of childbirth? I wrote in the first post that there is explicit nudity of a pregnant woman in excerpt. In the second post, I gave a link to a full short film, warning that there is a birth scene. Some people watch movies not for masturbation. Did you really read carefully?
But my friend ,this is not a site for documentaries about the life!! Are you sick? I agree with letsgroove
sowbb
Moderator
The beginning of the film (before the birth, on the beach) seems to be eroticized intentionally by the filmmakers and there are explicit acts involving fingers and her vagina (again, before the birth). The birth itself is not erotic and is disturbing to some, but @Petr_1988 gave a fair warning.
I don't see a significant difference between this and any other explicit documentary, which are allowed. Is a real-life child birth more disturbing than, for example, "The River of Fundament"? If the birth itself was the sexualized part then I would had considered it more closely, but that is not the case. And BTW, if you watched "A Serbian Film" there is a sexualized child birth scene ("New-born porn") that is allowed here because (A) it was faked and (B) it was meant to disturb in it's cruelty and vulgarness in order to make an important point.
Bottom line: the birth scene is not in any way exploitive nor sexualized, and it's not even meant to shock. There is explicit penetration not involving the newborn. An appropriate warning was given. I think it can stay.