Explicit Cando toco un animal (2023)

mammos

Administrator

I found this movie on VK but there is some blurring censoring.


What's interesting, is that at the scene at 39:15, there is blurring, but it looks like she is either jerking him or masturbating in front of him while he puts the condom on, and it looks quite real, but I cannot really tell.

Has anyone seen the unblurred version because this might be interesting?

Edit: it's on Vimeo as well on demand but I'm not sure if it's still blurred.

 
Last edited:

mammos

Administrator
Does it show anything good? I can't rent it it says not available for my region even with vpn.
 

JohnsonJ

Well-Known Member
Thank you for posting this. In what world is this not worth it? She seems to be touching herself, he is hard, puts a condom on, she grabs it, and I am pretty sure puts it inside herself.
I would agree that it's not worth it for me, but to your point it's worth it for you. Something that needs to change around here is stuff being posted or talked about and be called "not worth it" or many other things that may cause others to not look into something they may actually like. State what it contains, whether it's confirmed but not shown explicit sexual acts, explicit nudity but not explicit sex, just T&A, etc, and let the individuals decide for themselves if it is worth it. I've ran into it a lot on this site where I originally didn't check something out because a user said it wasn't worth it, to later find out it was right up my alley.
 

mammos

Administrator
not worth it

Thank you for this and the effort, it's much appreciated. I wouldn't say that it's not worth it though because there is clearly genital contact and explicit grabbing of his penis. Not so sure if there is any actual penetration because after he puts the condom he is actually semi-hard, but we can never know for sure. And as always, the blanket sees all the action.

I am moving this to explicit scenes.
 

areskratos

Well-Known Member
I have to admit, I also hate it when somebody says something like "not worth it", sorry for that :D
But this time I was a bit frustrated with this movie.
It had so much potential but this movie and so many more are always missing something for me.
Yes, I did undersell it for some people but lowering one's expectations often leads to a better experience.
 

mammos

Administrator
Fair enough! But given the dry spell that we are going through these past few years, any explicit action is always welcomed here!
 

Warfighter02

Active Member
The actress is pretty enough, but the scene is sub-par to say the least. What ruined it for me though, is that dude's 2010s hipster man bun. I fricking hate man buns. This scene had so much potential, but that stupid man bun spoiled everything.
 

panda66

Member
I don't think it's worth it.

People always want more, but the actors are naked, the actor has an erection, he puts a condom on his sex.

Admittedly, it doesn't go as far as the short film "passion" or the movie"chronique sexuelle d'une famille d'aujourd'hui", but the scene in the film "cando toco" is still more explicit than 99% of the rest.

Vaginal penetration is still rare, 99% of movies don't go that far. It's not necessary^^

Don't forget that it's not easy to organize a film containing real sex! It's not easy to find actors willing to have explicit sex on screen. For the film "Chronique sexuelle d'aujourd'hui", casting took a long time. In fact, most of the actors came from the porn industry. With the exception of the actors in the first-time scene. I imagine it's the same principle for the film "Passion", casting couldn't have been easy.
 
Last edited:
Top